My blog has moved!
Please come and visit at my new home!
Thanks
The Blog of Adam Gray, helping people make sense of how to work with Social Media Marketing to deliver results for their marketing spend, and other (occasionally interesting) ramblings of a marketer!
...there was an advertising man who recognised that the rise of mass media opened-up a whole host of opportunities to sell things to unsuspecting prospects. He was smart enough to see a great opportunity. If he could interrupt these prospects repeatedly in their day-to-day lives when they weren’t expecting it he could influence their behaviour, and make them buy his client’s products – often even if they didn’t really want to, or need them! That man was Leo Burnett, the father of advertising. He built a global empire which was extremely good at influencing mass market behaviours.
After Leo Burnett came a tsunami of great advertisers - David Ogilvy (Ogilvy & Mather), James Walter Thompson (JWT), the Saatchi’s and countless others, each of them bringing their own style & flavour, and each of them building on the ideas of Leo Burnett.
The basis on which each of these organisations operated has been in essence the same since Leo Burnett began this kind of advertising; to produce eye catching ads, which through the platforms created by mass media attract people’s attention, and influence their behaviour (usually to purchase). And, since Leo himself first wrote copy for Cadillac in 1917 the techniques employed by advertisers have worked, and worked well.
These proven techniques have informed other types of marketing and promotion – and they have all been based on the same premise. Talk often enough to a large enough group of people, in ever more creative ways and a proportion of them will listen to what you have to say.
Of course there will be those who argue that this isn’t the case, and the dynamics of direct mail, advertising, evens and direct sales are fundamentally different, but there’s not. They are all based on the assumption that a portion of the people to whom you are trying to talk aren’t listening, or actively don’t want to listen, and that this wastage is inherent in any campaign or marketing strategy, and that this is part of the cost of the campaign itself. And until recently there’s been no believable alternative market model for how to promote products and services.
The problem with this old model is not that it doesn’t work, just that we can no longer make it work because that natural wastage has become so large that campaigns are not financially viable in the way that they used to be.
The reason for this is that the amount of choice available to the audience to just too great. Hundreds of TV channels, thousands of radio stations, millions of websites, billboards, hoardings, door-to-door flyers, direct mail, email, text messaging, mean that there are simply too many avenues. Too many avenues for the audience to bear, too many avenues for us to manage. No longer can an advert in the back of the Sunday paper guarantee to bring anything home. Despite the profiling of the readers/listeners/views/traffic, it doesn’t work, and it doesn’t work for two reasons.
i) the internet has enabled each of us to be individuals rather than one of a crowd. Yes, the global village is a much used term, but the fact remains that if you are passionate about something, no matter how obscure, within the global village there will be plenty of others who are passionate about the same thing. And you only want to know about things that you care about.
ii) the audience has become really good at ignoring our messages. Can you remember your favourite ad on TV at the moment? Probably not. Can you remember all the ads you drove past on your way to work? Probably not. That’s because you tune them out. They’ve simply become wallpaper.
The reason that you choose to tune these ads-out is because you have higher expectations, you want to have ads which are of interest to you, showing products which you do want to buy from brands that you do care about.
I really struggle to understand why some organisations can be such luddites! Each year they produce a new brochure/website/direct mail campaign, and each year they hope that it will revolutionise their sales – in exactly the same way it didn’t last year, or the year before, or the year…
Anyway, I wondered why when it comes to design and marketing the client rarely asks what ROI can I expect, or what can this do for me. Instead they ask how much will it cost, and what have you done for others previously!
The irony is that these days, with the paradigm shifts happening on a monthly basis, there really IS NO PREVIOUSLY. The whole market is virgin, and very few businesses or agencies seem to understand that the proven model on which we base our marketing behaviours is irrelevant.
Google is the fastest growing company in history, from 0 – $125bn in just 10 years, and they didn’t do this by copying what others have done, or doing stuff the old way.
Throw away the rule book, throw-out the baby with the bath water, and really look at what’s going-on, then think how your business can capitalise on this world of possibilities.
Good luck, and goodnight!
If you’ve not yet seen Google Wave, you should have a look.
Email isn’t a good way of communicating really, it’s simply an electronic version of the postal system…
Imagine recreating written communications using the functionality of the internet as a basis, rather than the functionality of the horse and saddlebag…
What you have is Google Wave. Currently in Beta testing, this promises to offer email, forums, blogs and wikis all in one. It will probably change how we communicate on line for ever… for the better.
We all remember 15 years ago saying “email… what’s the point?”! Don't make the same mistake with Google Wave.
Well Google Wave, you heard it here first (or perhaps second!)
The Apple WWDC has finally answered all of the fundamental shortcomings of the iPhone. 300 hrs standby and 10 hours talktime, video recording (and editing), MMS, cut and paste, voice control, and soon turn-by-turn satellite navigation.
I shall look forward to watching Apple’s quest for domination of the entire technology market continue!
but in these days of recession, where redundancies are commonplace, credit terms are being stretched, and a general feeling of worry seems to pervade every corner of the workplace, why are your “loyal” staff lacking the commitment that they should have? After all, you’ve been good to them for years haven’t you?
Well, you may well have paid them, but in the 21st century that isn’t enough. People have unlimited choices, and can have their CV distributed to the four corners of the world within minutes if they’re of a mind to.
If you don’t communicate effectively with them; explaining what you’re doing and why, helping them to share your vision and making them feel included, there’s little chance they’ll be there for you – why should they be?
Imagine Company X.
It’s been manufacturing widgets for years, and whilst it is proud of its past, it has been very keen to keep it’s employees happy. Everyone in the company has enjoyed healthy bonuses, and the last two decades has been a boom time in the widget market much like the economy as a whole. This has meant that a relaxed atmosphere, a happy and committed workforce, and a string growth have been hallmarks of the company.
However, the last 18 months has not been quite so easy. Increased competition from China, a slowdown in the global market for widgets, and clients taking longer to pay has meant that Company X has had to make some redundancies.
Because the company hasn’t explained why they’ve made the redundancies, the remaining staff fear that they’re going to be next, they feel in the dark – they didn’t know that the company was in trouble until some of their friends lost their jobs.
There’s now a tangible sense of low morale amongst the workforce, and despite the fact that much of the dead-wood has been removed and savings have been made, there seem to be other problems emerging. Things are going from bad to worse.
After what could have been cleansing for the business, other areas are starting to crack; increased absenteeism, reduced commitment, increased staff churn, even graffiti in the toilets all help to make the company look and feel like it’s the end of the road.
Had the staff been on side, it could have been a very different story. An on-going campaign to engage and excite the staff could have helped them to feel some ownership of the business, and been sympathetic its plight. Hell, they might even have solved the problem for Company X.
Staff who know where they’re going and why are more committed, and work harder than those that are simply remunerated (no matter how you dress it up as a package of employee benefits). Staff want to see how their contribution helps the company achieve its goals, and they want to help shape the future of the business too, they want to have a voice and have it heard.
In a recession, they way to make businesses strong isn’t to cut staffing costs, but to maximise value from those overheads, by getting people to work harder, faster and better. And the easy way to do that is to make them want the company to succeed.
This morning I presented a version (in part) of Seth Godin’s thinking that he explores in “Sliced Bread and Other Marketing Delights”. The presentation examined possible reasons as to why advertising and marketing doesn’t seem to be as effective as it has been in the past. It also explored the rise of social media and how the power of “Permission Marketing” might be harnessed to get our message across to people who actually want to hear it rather than those actively don’t!
Following the presentation there were some interesting discussions, and whilst everyone acknowledged that the marketing they were doing wasn’t as successful as it had been in the past, they seemed to think that at some point in the future things would change back, and “normal service would be resumed” - but, like Cuba, we might have a VERY long wait!
I think the problem that we all face is that the internet and in particular Google, has changed the landscape to the extent that none of the old paradigms are necessarily true. And it is this directionless world of uncertainty in which we now operate. What we know is that the old order doesn’t hold water any more. What we don’t know, is what the new order looks like!
Organisations recognise that placing sub-standard ads, in sub-standard no longer yield results in the way that it used to, but they still chug-on regardless, afraid to throw away the rule book and do something which gives them a competitive advantage.
We all know that clients & prospects now have huge, and very little time. The last thing they want is more wallpaper that they can ignore.
Act now - before it's too late!
Copyright © 2009 The Art of Communication All rights reserved. Theme by Laptop Geek. | Bloggerized by FalconHive.